Washington’s prototypical school funding model
How the model works, in three steps
1. Count students in FTE
The state counts students in FTE - full-time equivalent - which measures enrollment by how much school a student actually attends, not just how many bodies are counted. A student enrolled half-time counts as 0.5 FTE, not 1. The state uses this funding FTE by grade span, then converts it into shares of model elementary, middle and high schools.
2. Generate a staffing allocation
Each model school is assigned teacher ratios and fractional positions for principals, counselors, librarians, office staff, custodians and nurses. A district with 1.5 elementary schools' worth of students generates 1.5 times the elementary staffing.
3. Turn positions into dollars
The state applies salary and benefit assumptions, regionalization, materials and operating costs, then adds funding for students with additional needs.
These are funding allocations, not a required staffing plan. Districts can organize schools differently, but must cover anything beyond the formula with other available revenue.
The three prototypical schools
The model defines three school sizes. They are accounting constructs - no district is required to build a school of exactly this size.
| Prototype | Model size | Funded class size |
|---|---|---|
| Elementary | 400 students | K-3 ≈ 17, grades 4-6 ≈ 27 |
| Middle | 432 students | Grades 7-8 ≈ 28.53 |
| High | 600 students | Grades 9-12 ≈ 28.74, CTE ≈ 23 |
Funded class sizes
These are the class sizes the state pays for. They are not a legal cap on real classes - a district can run larger or smaller classes, and many do.
| Grade band | Students per teacher | Note |
|---|---|---|
| K-3 | 17 | The smallest funded class sizes, phased in after McCleary. |
| Grades 4-6 | 27 | A single step up from the K-3 band. |
| Grades 7-8 | 28.53 | Middle school staffing is generated at this ratio. |
| Grades 9-12 | 28.74 | The largest funded general-education class size. |
| Career & technical education | 23 | Lower because labs and shops need space. |
What the model generates statewide
Rolled up across every district, the formula components the model drives look like this.
37% of the allocation
14% of the allocation
9% of the allocation
See MSOC funding for how the non-staff portion is set, and your own district's numbers in the District Explorer.
What the model leaves out
The prototypical model generates a state allocation. It is not the whole budget: local enrichment levies and federal programs fund positions and services on top of it, and the model does not attempt to describe those.
The statutory parameters have moved several times - EHB 2242 (2017) restructured the salary allocations after McCleary, and 2SHB 1664 (2022) increased the counselor, nurse and office-support allocations, finishing its phase-in for 2024-25. Figures here reflect the statute as currently in effect.
Statutory parameters: RCW 28A.150.260. Every source is listed on Sources & Methodology.